He's WHAT?

The JAM · Post by **The JAM** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 8:50 pm

[...unWARP!!!]

Good evening.

Erotic?? Isn't that a no-no at this stage of the relationship? Or is she just referring to the foot massages that?

Until next time, remember:

I AM THE J.A.M.

Good evening.

[WARP!!!]

Marcus Talbain · Post by **Marcus Talbain** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 10:55 pm

hmmmm, "can lick own eyebrows"....now There's something for the ol' resume...

DracoDei · Post by **DracoDei** » Wed Dec 31, 2003 8:24 am

Not the job resume of course... but the resume under current discussion in the comic, yes.

Bolo Unit_BRL of the Line · Wed Dec 31, 2003 10:35 am

Ah... er... um... that is an... interesting descriptor to ascribe Ben.

The JAM · Post by **The JAM** » Wed Dec 31, 2003 3:59 pm

[...unWARP!!!]

Good evening.

Petunia should be glad Ben isn't a *giraffe*, lol...

Until next time, remember:

I AM THE J.A.M.

Good evening.

[WARP!!!]

DracoDei · Post by **DracoDei** » Wed Dec 31, 2003 4:42 pm

Bolo Unit_BRL of the Line wrote:Ah... er... um... that is an... interesting descriptor to ascribe Ben.

I assume you mean "Thiller"?

If so:

There exists a confusion between looks on the one hand with skill/motivation/talent on the other.

The above is important... but as a small edition, keep in mind the speakers are female although Petunia has evidently perhaps been 're-tuned' by Hollywood. This may or may not be relevant, and in any case I am hardly saying it is universally true (just more often than not), but where-as the male sex drive is linked more strongly to the eyes, the female sex drive is linked more strongly to the emotions. Leasurely dinner with hubby VS lingerie.
My point is that leaving morality and ethics aside Lily is exhibiting the statistically more common take on the issue in chosing between looks and actions.

The JAM · Post by **The JAM** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 8:42 pm

[...unWARP!!!]

Good evening.

I've heard the first half of that joke a few times, but never the whole thing....

...question is, do I *want* to know what does shoe size have to do with *anything*?

HILARIOUS keeping-a-straight-face expression on Lily in that first panel!! Love those fangs, too!

Until next time, remember:

I AM THE J.A.M.

Good evening.

[WARP!!!]

RHJunior · Post by **RHJunior** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 11:42 pm

I don't have the heart.

One of you-all tell him.

Trillan · Post by **Trillan** » Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:45 am

It's okay, RH, I'll answer it for him:

The JAM wrote:...question is, do I *want* to know what does shoe size have to do with *anything*?

No, you really don't.

...what? I said I'd answer the question.

Oh, fine. It goes to the idea that the "extras" on the human body are directly proportional in size: Nose, feet, hands, penis, etc.

Thus all the "Big feet... big shoes" cop outs and such in movies.

The JAM · Post by **The JAM** » Fri Jan 02, 2004 7:19 pm

[...unWARP!!!]

Good evening.

I had the feeling it had something to do with that. Obviously a distortion of DaVinci's observations.

Until next time, remember:

I AM THE J.A.M.

Good evening.

[WARP!!!]

Earl McClaw · Post by **Earl McClaw** » Fri Jan 02, 2004 8:07 pm

The problem is a researcher published (in 2003) findings that disprove some of those proportionality theories, IIRC.

And anyway, the length of the foot is supposed to relate to the length of the forearm. Petunia should have been looking for a pair of Ben's gloves.

Comic Genesis Forums

He's WHAT?

He's WHAT?

Hmmm...

Footpaw prints?

Re: Footpaw prints?

Heh