Oh, I wasn't disagreeing with you at all - on the contrary, I just wanted to explain why Disney is still using the licensed properties despite that legal battle: Disney does not even contest that the characters aren't theirs, and that they should pay somebody something for their use - the battle, right now, is just about to whom they'll end up having to pay which amount.Jim North wrote:I'm not disputing the legal situation (I'm well aware it's a rather big, nasty battle), I'm disputing the idea that Disney doesn't use ideas from the original stories anymore. In the two primary Kingdom Hearts games alone, many of the Winnie the Pooh levels are taken directly from stuff in the books. Or, well, directly from Disney WtP cartoons which were taken directly from stuff in the books, which is pretty much the same.Nervous Spy wrote:Well, the legal situation is rather more complicated
This may not be true...But oh god if it is :D
Forum rules
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
- Nervous Spy
- For your Eyes Only
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:26 pm
- Contact:
My new avatar is by someone who holds many <a href="http://indepos.comicgenesis.com/">Indefensible Positions</a>.
I'm just glad Disney never got around to butchering Ducktales. I can't see how a movie of Ducktales could fail (other than in profits, which is the most important detail of all, cost effective-wise
) but somehow I can only imagine if they made a Ducktales movie these days, it would fail epically. Probably fill it with current time catchphrases and pop-culture references.
I do adore animated movies about treasure hunting though.
...
DAMMIT MAKE ME A NEW DUCKTALES MOVIE.
I do adore animated movies about treasure hunting though.
...
DAMMIT MAKE ME A NEW DUCKTALES MOVIE.
Caught in the headlamp glare of your own blinding vanity/Mesmerised by the stare of your shallow personality
Gorging the junk food of flattery you drag your fat ego around/Everyone floored by the battering you give to whoever's around
Oh Narcissus you petulant child admiring yourself in the curve of my eyes/Oh Narcissus you angel beguiled unsated by self you do nothing but die
Gorging the junk food of flattery you drag your fat ego around/Everyone floored by the battering you give to whoever's around
Oh Narcissus you petulant child admiring yourself in the curve of my eyes/Oh Narcissus you angel beguiled unsated by self you do nothing but die
My primary issue with Pooh as far as the Disney versions go is that the actual Milne stories are actually aimed at more mature readers/listeners than the Disney stuff comes across to me as. (Kingdom Hearts aside.) I discovered this by accident when I selected a real Pooh compendium to read to some toddlers at 'storytime' and discovered that all of the stories were muuuch too long for their attention spans.Jim North wrote:I'm not disputing the legal situation (I'm well aware it's a rather big, nasty battle), I'm disputing the idea that Disney doesn't use ideas from the original stories anymore. In the two primary Kingdom Hearts games alone, many of the Winnie the Pooh levels are taken directly from stuff in the books. Or, well, directly from Disney WtP cartoons which were taken directly from stuff in the books, which is pretty much the same.Nervous Spy wrote:Well, the legal situation is rather more complicated
- EvilChihuahua
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:59 pm
- Location: Canadaland
- Contact:
*Sigh*
Disney, you have hurt me so often in the past....do not raise my hopes only to dash them once more...
On a less melodramatic note, Lilo and Stich 2 was actually funnier than the original. I still like the first one better, but hey.
Also, what happened to that new 2-D Disney film about the black princess that rumour said was in the works? The frog one. Is that still on?
Disney, you have hurt me so often in the past....do not raise my hopes only to dash them once more...
On a less melodramatic note, Lilo and Stich 2 was actually funnier than the original. I still like the first one better, but hey.
Also, what happened to that new 2-D Disney film about the black princess that rumour said was in the works? The frog one. Is that still on?
- Dracomax
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:13 pm
- Location: in a defective ficional universe
- Contact:
just to back up mcduffies, to some extent, mickey was much more interesting in the 40s and 50s. He was a shit disturber, and an all around rapscullion. In his forst movie he stole a boat.
He also has the dubious pleasure to be the only american cartoon/comic character not banned by mussolini.
Unfortunately, he has been sanitised.
He also has the dubious pleasure to be the only american cartoon/comic character not banned by mussolini.
Unfortunately, he has been sanitised.



You and TRI are the crazy mad ones.~Cope
Give a man a fire, keep him warm for a day; set a man on fire, keep him warm for life.~unknown
- Ahaugen
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 2291
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:44 am
- Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
- Contact:
Here Here!!Dotty wrote:I'm just glad Disney never got around to butchering Ducktales. I can't see how a movie of Ducktales could fail (other than in profits, which is the most important detail of all, cost effective-wise) but somehow I can only imagine if they made a Ducktales movie these days, it would fail epically. Probably fill it with current time catchphrases and pop-culture references.
I do adore animated movies about treasure hunting though.
...
DAMMIT MAKE ME A NEW DUCKTALES MOVIE.
Read The Times-Picayune
Comic Genesis' daily source for news since 2009
A Lamestream Media Company
Comic Genesis' daily source for news since 2009
A Lamestream Media Company
- Frankodragon
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:04 pm
- Location: Cheese State
- Contact:
- Joel Fagin
- nothos adrisor (GTC)
- Posts: 6014
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:15 am
- Location: City of Lights
- Contact:
It is, apparently, true and word is that CEO of Apple, creator of Pixar and Disney board member Steve Jobs is responsible.
He always did have a very, very low tolerance for poor products and usually expresses it brutally and unequivocally. The Disney direct to DVD movies, however, he described as a fairly tame "embarrassing". Possibly a journalist was about at the time so he couldn't go all out.
- Joel Fagin
He always did have a very, very low tolerance for poor products and usually expresses it brutally and unequivocally. The Disney direct to DVD movies, however, he described as a fairly tame "embarrassing". Possibly a journalist was about at the time so he couldn't go all out.
- Joel Fagin
- Black Sparrow
- Cartoon Anti-Hero
- Posts: 6973
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:04 am
- Location: Violating your restraining order
- Contact:
- Robin Pierce
- The Establishment (Moderator)

- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:48 am
- Location: Should we check the internet? :S
- Contact:



















