Quandry

Sweet or Sour · Post by **Sweet or Sour** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:02 am

Just a little curious, have been noticing that a lot of people are including things in their explanation line "because those strapons tend to be HUGE" [coming from someone specific as a direct quote, but also from many as a generalized idea] or "the gay man would be hairy/fat and ugly probably" [again as before]. Would your answers change or at least be differently balanced if you are considering only near-idealized cases? Realistically sized non-spiked non-exploding non-gas-powered strapons, good looking and fit examples of whatever genders or gender meshes are applicable to any of the choices, and an assured void of disease/contamination/"poison" as is reasonably expectable to be void of, and inclusion of any comfort-aiding things [lube, not too rough, ect]. Would your choice or choice balance change if you can throw caution and expected non-ideals [within reason] to the wind.

Ce6 · Post by **Ce6** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:31 pm

Honor wrote:
ce6 wrote:TL;DidR
I can't help feeling like I should be able to decipher that... But I haven't been able to.

ce6 wrote:...I prefer to avoid a flame war at this time...
I'm sorry.

I never meant for there to be a flame war... Or even a small flame skirmish. I just really, really, really like vigorous discussion. Some people jog or climb rocks, I debate. Mental exercise has always been my favorite, and I so deeply enjoy crafting arguments that it's kind of obscene. I blame it on that natural litigator gene. I'll try to keep it on a leash.

TL;DR is apparently slang for "Too Long; Didn't Read", though unlike Bushie with the Constitution, I did take the effort to read your post, so I modified the abbreviation accordingly. After all, you did make the effort to analyze my rebuttal.
I have seen ample evidence of your enjoyment of intelligent discussion, and while I appreciate a good solid debate, I dislike arguements as much as misplaced violence. And this one was de-evolving into personal affronts far too quickly, so I figured it best to admit my mistakes where due before Godwin's Law had to be invoked.

Tha_Pig · Post by **Tha_Pig** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:57 pm

Sweet or Sour wrote:Just a little curious, have been noticing that a lot of people are including things in their explanation line "because those strapons tend to be HUGE" [coming from someone specific as a direct quote, but also from many as a generalized idea] or "the gay man would be hairy/fat and ugly probably" [again as before]. Would your answers change or at least be differently balanced if you are considering only near-idealized cases? Realistically sized non-spiked non-exploding non-gas-powered strapons, good looking and fit examples of whatever genders or gender meshes are applicable to any of the choices, and an assured void of disease/contamination/"poison" as is reasonably expectable to be void of, and inclusion of any comfort-aiding things [lube, not too rough, ect]. Would your choice or choice balance change if you can throw caution and expected non-ideals [within reason] to the wind.

Sure. You

RantinAn · Post by **RantinAn** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:49 pm

to quote my self from the loooong dead lymerick thread

mabye you might think i am sick
but i do like the girls who have dick
their titties are perky
their packages quirky
you know that my holes they can stick.

Urrm yeah, i take option number three as long as the pre op is happy with it.

Wilmo · Post by **Wilmo** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:38 pm

Tha_Pig wrote:
Sweet or Sour wrote:Just a little curious, have been noticing that a lot of people are including things in their explanation line "because those strapons tend to be HUGE" [coming from someone specific as a direct quote, but also from many as a generalized idea] or "the gay man would be hairy/fat and ugly probably" [again as before]. Would your answers change or at least be differently balanced if you are considering only near-idealized cases? Realistically sized non-spiked non-exploding non-gas-powered strapons, good looking and fit examples of whatever genders or gender meshes are applicable to any of the choices, and an assured void of disease/contamination/"poison" as is reasonably expectable to be void of, and inclusion of any comfort-aiding things [lube, not too rough, ect]. Would your choice or choice balance change if you can throw caution and expected non-ideals [within reason] to the wind.
QFT

Sure. You

Swordsman3003 · Post by **Swordsman3003** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:08 pm

Honor wrote: Pacifist... Hm. I'd certainly say I'm a "peace loving" person... But pacifism..? The staunch belief that war or violence is simply never justifiable...? So we shoulda stuck with telling Hitler that he wasn't being a good dictator? Maybe we could show our disapproval for the wholesale extirmination of Jews, gypsies, blacks, and homosexuals by changing the name of "hamburger" to "Freedom Beef"?

We changed saurkraut to "liberty cabbage"

Tellner · Post by **Tellner** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:15 pm

swordsman3003 wrote:
Honor wrote: Maybe we could show our disapproval for the wholesale extirmination of Jews, gypsies, blacks, and homosexuals by changing the name of "hamburger" to "Freedom Beef"?
We changed saurkraut to "liberty cabbage"

...and the guys who changed the name of French Fries can Freedom Kiss my ass.

Nithos · Post by **Nithos** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:18 pm

Speaking of cabbage, I would just like to take this opportunity to remind everyone of Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage.

Ce6 · Post by **Ce6** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:15 pm

tellner wrote:
swordsman3003 wrote:
Honor wrote: Maybe we could show our disapproval for the wholesale extirmination of Jews, gypsies, blacks, and homosexuals by changing the name of "hamburger" to "Freedom Beef"?
We changed saurkraut to "liberty cabbage"
...and the guys who changed the name of French Fries can Freedom Kiss my ass.

Funny thing I remember from high school French class. According to my teacher at that time, in France it's called a "baiser am

CottonStar · Post by **CottonStar** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:06 am

That's funny stuff.

Honor · Post by **Honor** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:46 am

[quote="ce6"]According to my teacher at that time, in France it's called a "baiser am

Ce6 · Post by **Ce6** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:27 pm

[quote="Honor"][quote="ce6"]According to my teacher at that time, in France it's called a "baiser am

Honor · Post by **Honor** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:33 am

[quote="ce6"]I'm not sure if I was entirely clear in my above statement. Just for the record (if anyone's confused):
French Kiss == baiser am

Tellner · Post by **Tellner** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:23 am

ce6 wrote:(I'd assumed tellner was using the recent language butchery trend to convert "French Kiss" to "Freedom Kiss")

Yep.

Wilmo · Post by **Wilmo** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:29 pm

getting back on topic...

I'd say, pre-op tranny all the way.

HentaiCat · Post by **HentaiCat** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:57 pm

getting back on topic...

I'd say, pre-op tranny all the way.

But it still gives you that

Swordsman3003 · Post by **Swordsman3003** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:11 am

I don't know, to me it seems sort of the fun would be your lover orgasming 'inside' you, at least that's what many women say they like about sex...

HentaiCat · Post by **HentaiCat** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:05 am

I don't know, to me it seems sort of the fun would be your lover orgasming 'inside' you, at least that's what many women say they like about sex...

You know

Swordsman3003 · Post by **Swordsman3003** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:02 pm

typical male >:P

HentaiCat · Post by **HentaiCat** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:01 pm

typical male >

Well it would sure be an interesting feeling, Guess I cant say much until I try it... But ya Hopefully I will be doing it the "typical male" way before the other way

(How many typical males like the idea of being on the tentacle end of a tentacle monster?)

Comic Genesis Forums

Quandry

How would you save the world?

Re: Quandry