Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Forum rules
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
- Yeahduff
- Resident Stoic (Moderator)
- Posts: 9158
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 4:16 pm
- Location: I jumped into your grave and died.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Huh, so these are two different authors.
- Komiyan
- HOLD ON TO YOUR INTERNETS!!
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 11:35 am
- Location: Hrmph.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Pratchett, no question, he's invented a fantastic and deeply interesting world full of diverse and fascinating characters.
I could barely stand Hitchhikers, it was like a bunch of comedy sketches very slightly strung together with a 'plot', and the characters didn't mean a thing to me.
I could barely stand Hitchhikers, it was like a bunch of comedy sketches very slightly strung together with a 'plot', and the characters didn't mean a thing to me.
- Dracomax
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:13 pm
- Location: in a defective ficional universe
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
I have to say, mostly harmless didn't end much better.[AlmightyPyro] wrote:Terry Pratchett has been said to be like the Douglas Adams of fantasy. Now I recently read The Color of Magic, and it really made me want to start reading the Hitchhikers' series again (especially after The Color of Magic's ending OMG!!) So I just finished The Life the Universe and Everything, and I got to tell you, I personally think Adams makes Pratchett look campy.
You and TRI are the crazy mad ones.~Cope
Give a man a fire, keep him warm for a day; set a man on fire, keep him warm for life.~unknown
- Vorticus
- Backrub Fiend
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Walking on sunshine
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
If I had to choose I'd say Pratchett however I enjoy them both a lot. Some of Adam's other works flow better than the later hitchhiker's guide books. I've yet to get to Pratchett's later work though.
- Komiyan
- HOLD ON TO YOUR INTERNETS!!
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 11:35 am
- Location: Hrmph.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Nthing that colour of Magic isn't the best place to start with Pratchett, by the way. Pick up Guards Guards and work your way through The Watch series, you won't be disappointed.
- Pimpette
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 4147
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 10:13 pm
- Location: Comi-what now?
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
seeing as hitchhiker's started off as a radio show that was largely made up as it went along, I think it turned out pretty good.
But Douglas Adams brand humour has me in stitches whenever I read it.
I didn't vote because I haven't read any Pratchett (yet!), but I fully intend to once autumn (and thus fewer OMG MUST DO items) rolls around. I hear so much about Discworld, it's about time I picked some up.
I go through too many pornos and re-reads anyway.
But Douglas Adams brand humour has me in stitches whenever I read it.
I didn't vote because I haven't read any Pratchett (yet!), but I fully intend to once autumn (and thus fewer OMG MUST DO items) rolls around. I hear so much about Discworld, it's about time I picked some up.
I go through too many pornos and re-reads anyway.
- BrownEyedCat
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:24 pm
- Location: Lurking in the Corners
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
To be honest, the reason I put it in that category isn't for any major plot reasons - it's that Koom Valley shows up in so many other books. Any time Trolls and Dwarves come up, so does Koom Valley, usually as a one-off joke. That meant that the time Thud rolled around, Koom Valley was well established in the world building and the culture for me, and the associated payoffs were HUGE.Rkolter wrote:Odd, I thought Thud was one of Pratchett's best books, and I hadn't read any of the other Vimes books at that point.
Thud is currently my favorite Discworld book. (I also got my copy signed in person!)
- Mo
- Cartoon Villain (GTC)
- Posts: 5085
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:55 am
- Location: On the shoulder of a giant
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
I had to vote Adams because I've read the Hitchhikers books several times and they still crack me up. Just something about his style never fails to entertain me.
My cat was named after Marvin.
Also, I'm more into sci-fi than fantasy, so that might have something to do with it.
My cat was named after Marvin.
Also, I'm more into sci-fi than fantasy, so that might have something to do with it.
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Your best bet is to check the Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discworld : pick a series, then read them in order. The Witches, the City Watch, and Tiffany Aching series are all good bets. So are the 2 Moist von Ludwig books. I'd recommend the Watch series first, just cause it will eventually get you to Night Watch, and by association, Monstrous Regiment.
- Laemkral
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 3269
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:10 am
- Location: I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
I've only read Adams, Pratchett is something I'll start on soon after I do some more "professional" reading (ie military books) for a while. However, I'm a passionate Adams fan. The HHGTTG series gets read every year and I love every single one of the books. I've also read both Dirk Gentlys and the Salmon of Doubt, and enjoyed those as well. The books have even made the trek to Iraq with me (and on leave).
Avatar courtesy of Fading Aura.
Heed these words: I do not draw. Photos if you're lucky.
Heed these words: I do not draw. Photos if you're lucky.
- McDuffies
- Bob was here (Moderator)
- Posts: 29957
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Serbia
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Are they supposed to? No characters in "Airplane" mean anything, but it's still good. Personally I always thought that fleshed out characters stand in the way of parody and that it works best with total cliches. For the same reason, books worked best when the plot was flimsy or non-existant.Komiyan wrote:I could barely stand Hitchhikers, it was like a bunch of comedy sketches very slightly strung together with a 'plot', and the characters didn't mean a thing to me.
- Rkolter
- Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
- Posts: 16399
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 4:34 am
- Location: It's equally probable that I'm everywhere.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
The fact that you liked "Airplane" tells me something about you I didn't realize McDuffies. That was my second-favorite movie as a kid, next to The Cannonball Run.McDuffies wrote:Are they supposed to? No characters in "Airplane" mean anything, but it's still good. Personally I always thought that fleshed out characters stand in the way of parody and that it works best with total cliches. For the same reason, books worked best when the plot was flimsy or non-existant.Komiyan wrote:I could barely stand Hitchhikers, it was like a bunch of comedy sketches very slightly strung together with a 'plot', and the characters didn't mean a thing to me.
- Komiyan
- HOLD ON TO YOUR INTERNETS!!
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 11:35 am
- Location: Hrmph.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Then we're after two different things when we read books or movies. If I can't get interested in the characters, I just can't get interested in the whole thing, which is why I hated things like The Matrix (all action pieces, no character), and didn't find Airplane or Hitchhikers that good either. A string of jokes just isn't enough for me, on its own.McDuffies wrote:Are they supposed to? No characters in "Airplane" mean anything, but it's still good. Personally I always thought that fleshed out characters stand in the way of parody and that it works best with total cliches. For the same reason, books worked best when the plot was flimsy or non-existant.Komiyan wrote:I could barely stand Hitchhikers, it was like a bunch of comedy sketches very slightly strung together with a 'plot', and the characters didn't mean a thing to me.
That said, Hot Fuzz was action movie parody all the way, and I cared about those characters..
- McDuffies
- Bob was here (Moderator)
- Posts: 29957
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Serbia
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
I don't look for the same thing in all books or movies. It's important what you're trying to achieve.Komiyan wrote: Then we're after two different things when we read books or movies. If I can't get interested in the characters, I just can't get interested in the whole thing, which is why I hated things like The Matrix (all action pieces, no character), and didn't find Airplane or Hitchhikers that good either. A string of jokes just isn't enough for me, on its own.
That said, Hot Fuzz was action movie parody all the way, and I cared about those characters..
Parodies aim to deconstruct elements of original and turn them around so to show all it's faults. If a genre is known for stereotypical characters (and most of them are), then parody is best viciously playing on those stereotypes, and trying to expand those stereotypes will do disservice to the whole piece. Parody is basically a postmodern genre, and as such it's not talking about characters or plots, it's talking about fiction. Real subject of "Airplane" is not airplane disaster or people on the plane, it's airplane disaster movies.
In a character-driven book or film, I'll certainly expect genuine characters with whom I can sympathize.
Anyways I though Hot Fuzz was supposed to be an action movie with comedy elements, not a parody. Or more precise, it's an hommage to police movies, it's affectionate towards genre, unlike parodies which are usually rather critical.
Eh? What does it tell about me?The fact that you liked "Airplane" tells me something about you I didn't realize McDuffies. That was my second-favorite movie as a kid, next to The Cannonball Run.
- Dracomax
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:13 pm
- Location: in a defective ficional universe
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
I don't look for the same thing in all books or movies. It's important what you're trying to achieve.McDuffies wrote:Komiyan wrote: <snipperoonie>
That said, Hot Fuzz was action movie parody all the way, and I cared about those characters..
Parodies aim to deconstruct elements of original and turn them around so to show all it's faults. If a genre is known for stereotypical characters (and most of them are), then parody is best viciously playing on those stereotypes, and trying to expand those stereotypes will do disservice to the whole piece. Parody is basically a postmodern genre, and as such it's not talking about characters or plots, it's talking about fiction. Real subject of "Airplane" is not airplane disaster or people on the plane, it's airplane disaster movies.
Anyways I though Hot Fuzz was supposed to be an action movie with comedy elements, not a parody. Or more precise, it's an hommage to police movies, it's affectionate towards genre, unlike parodies which are usually rather critical.
/quote]
I think we are operating under slightly different definitions of parody. Yours is likely more technically correct, but My definition boils down mostly to "A funny version of the thing being paraodied, often making fun of elements assosiated with a work or genre" which does not preclude characters or plots which are fun and developed.
You and TRI are the crazy mad ones.~Cope
Give a man a fire, keep him warm for a day; set a man on fire, keep him warm for life.~unknown
- Rkolter
- Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
- Posts: 16399
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 4:34 am
- Location: It's equally probable that I'm everywhere.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Not so many people really liked Airplane. It tells me that you thought a manshaped blob of jello is funny. And that you got the funny reference to Jaws at the start. And that you got sick to death of the 'Don't Call me Shirley' joke. And that you thought the inflating autopilot was funny (and that you caught the similarity in Men in Black when they used the same gag).McDuffies wrote:Eh? What does it tell about me?The fact that you liked "Airplane" tells me something about you I didn't realize McDuffies. That was my second-favorite movie as a kid, next to The Cannonball Run.
See, now I know LOTS about you. I'm almost your twin. Minus fur, a tail, and like, ten-thousand posts.
- McDuffies
- Bob was here (Moderator)
- Posts: 29957
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Serbia
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Possibly. I'd call the other one simply a comedy that operates within the genre. Airplane guys or Mel Brooks were able to get away with a lot under the assumption that you weren't supposed to take anything seriously, that plot and characters benefited from being stereotypical, and that instead of reinforcing your suspension of disbelief, they were shattering it all the time. I think that's not too different from what Adams was doing, for instance in "Restaurant...", with it's "plot" it would hardly constitute a book if you were supposed to use the same criteriums as with most of the books.Dracomax wrote: I think we are operating under slightly different definitions of parody. Yours is likely more technically correct, but My definition boils down mostly to "A funny version of the thing being paraodied, often making fun of elements assosiated with a work or genre" which does not preclude characters or plots which are fun and developed.
I dunno, I just liked the jokes, specially the ones that were lame. I also like Jerry Lewis.Not so many people really liked Airplane. It tells me that you thought a manshaped blob of jello is funny. And that you got the funny reference to Jaws at the start. And that you got sick to death of the 'Don't Call me Shirley' joke. And that you thought the inflating autopilot was funny (and that you caught the similarity in Men in Black when they used the same gag).
See, now I know LOTS about you. I'm almost your twin. Minus fur, a tail, and like, ten-thousand posts.
- Laemkral
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 3269
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:10 am
- Location: I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar.
- Contact:
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
You bastard, you called it out before anyone could reference it. It was supposed to go like this:Rkolter wrote: And that you got sick to death of the 'Don't Call me Shirley' joke.
Surely you jest. No movie preference could be THAT revealing.Rkolter wrote:The fact that you liked "Airplane" tells me something about you I didn't realize McDuffies.McDuffies wrote:Are they supposed to? No characters in "Airplane" mean anything, but it's still good. Personally I always thought that fleshed out characters stand in the way of parody and that it works best with total cliches. For the same reason, books worked best when the plot was flimsy or non-existant.
But now it can't. It can't because you already said it.
Bastard.
Avatar courtesy of Fading Aura.
Heed these words: I do not draw. Photos if you're lucky.
Heed these words: I do not draw. Photos if you're lucky.
- Killbert-Robby
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 6876
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:28 am
- Location: in the butt
Re: Douglas Adams Vs. Terry Pratchett: The War of the Writers!
Simon Pegg DID mean for it to show how strong platonic love between two men can beKomiyan wrote:Then we're after two different things when we read books or movies. If I can't get interested in the characters, I just can't get interested in the whole thing, which is why I hated things like The Matrix (all action pieces, no character), and didn't find Airplane or Hitchhikers that good either. A string of jokes just isn't enough for me, on its own.McDuffies wrote:Are they supposed to? No characters in "Airplane" mean anything, but it's still good. Personally I always thought that fleshed out characters stand in the way of parody and that it works best with total cliches. For the same reason, books worked best when the plot was flimsy or non-existant.Komiyan wrote:I could barely stand Hitchhikers, it was like a bunch of comedy sketches very slightly strung together with a 'plot', and the characters didn't mean a thing to me.
That said, Hot Fuzz was action movie parody all the way, and I cared about those characters..