Making the Left-handed Shake Offensive Again

Noise Monkey · Post by **Noise Monkey** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:40 am

And THIS is why famous people shouldn't be allowed to have opinions.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6583067.stm

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:45 am

I'll do her one better and just stop wiping my ass. We should also enact a rule that states a toilet can only be flushed once the pile reaches a certain height. Could be 3 people, or maybe 5. Who knows. As long as we're crapping as one people in the same toilet, that's what counts.

Yeahduff · Post by **Yeahduff** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:57 am

theSuburbanLetdown wrote:I'll do her .

You dirtbag.

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:06 am

yeahduff wrote:
theSuburbanLetdown wrote:I'll do her .
You dirtbag.

You son of a bitch. Now I'll never give your eraser back.

Noise Monkey · Post by **Noise Monkey** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:10 am

that is not a valid substitute for the TP.

Yeahduff · Post by **Yeahduff** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:14 am

theSuburbanLetdown wrote:
yeahduff wrote:
theSuburbanLetdown wrote:I'll do her .
You dirtbag.
You son of a bitch. Now I'll never give your eraser back.

How will that help your womanizing?

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:17 am

yeahduff wrote:
theSuburbanLetdown wrote:
yeahduff wrote: You dirtbag.
You son of a bitch. Now I'll never give your eraser back.
How will that help your womanizing?

It contains your essence, so I'm picking up all your negative traits.

Rock_dash · Post by **Rock_dash** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:29 am

Why do all the news articles you link have to be about pooping?!

Killbert-Robby · Post by **Killbert-Robby** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:36 am

Because you are on the internets.

Rkolter · Post by **Rkolter** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:42 am

Apparently she hasn't considered that only 50% of people wash their hands when they leave the bathroom (unless they know they're being watched and it soars to over 90%).

So, by using 1 square of toilet paper either you will transmit more diseases, causing hospital stays which aren't very eco-friendly, or more hand-washing, and purification of water isn't very eco-friendly.

Not to mention, how will this be monitored? Either you have people stand there, which would be intolerable, or you use one of those automated release thigns like they have for paper towels. Well, that consumes electricity! Not eco-friendly electricity.

I love this lady. Every day she tries to increase my carbon footprint. Soon, my footprint will stretch across america. We'll squeeze nature until she finally shakes us off this rock, or squeals and gives up the ghost.

Muahahahaha.

Killbert-Robby · Post by **Killbert-Robby** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:44 am

Hmmmm. When I'm out drinking my hand washing drops below that to like 1%. But then again, considering the booze I spill on my hands, its probably cleaner.

That is, until I get dysentry.

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:45 am

I just took a dump and made Captain Planet cry. Though that's not too hard do, quite honetstly. Pansy.

Noise Monkey · Post by **Noise Monkey** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:48 am

rock_dash wrote:Why do all the news articles you link have to be about pooping?!

I'm rather depressed you even have to ask, Rock. I thought you knew me better than that.

Linkara · Post by **Linkara** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:55 am

*Stand up to podium and places on pair of glasses, then takes out spech and calmly puts it in front of him.*

Ahem.

REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF TOILET PAPER USES DOES NOT REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF TOILET PAPER PRODUCED, NOT THAT IT MATTERS ANYWAY BECAUSE WE DON'T CUT DOWN RAINFORESTS TO MAKE TOILET PAPER... OR ANY PAPER AT ALL! PAPER IS MADE FROM TREE FARMS DESIGNED EXCLUSIVELY TO MAKE PAPER, YOU IDIOT! I'M GLAD LANCE ARMSTRONG BROKE UP WITH YOU!

Thank you, and good night. *Walks off the stage.*

Killbert-Robby · Post by **Killbert-Robby** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:19 am

IN THE LONG TERM IT WOULD SINCE A LACK IN DEMAND CAUSES AN INCREASE IN SURPLUS STOCK WHICH MEANS SHOPS BUY LESS WHICH MEANS PRODUCERS SELL LESS WHICH MEANS THEY'RE WASTING MONEY ON MAKING A LOT OF USELESS STUFF IS GOING TO NEVER BE SOLD, SO THEY CUT BACK ON PRODUCTION, SO THEIR SUPPLIERS IN TURN CUT BACK. ITS A LONG PROCESS BUT IT HAPPENS. ALTHOUGH TRUE THAT THIS ISNT DONE IN THE RAINFOREST. OF COURSE THE DAMAGE TO THE ENVIROMENT DOESNT STOP AT THE CUTTING DOWN PART, THE WHOLE INDUSTRIAL PART OF MANUFACTURING AN SHIPPING POLLUTES.

That said, its still a stupid idea. So wait is that like one square of quintuple-ply paper?

Dr Legostar · Post by **Dr Legostar** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:52 am

most toilet paper is fairly weak, one square just ain't gonna cut it.

Noise Monkey · Post by **Noise Monkey** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:07 am

especially not after chili night.

TRI · Post by **TRI** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:17 am

Maybe Sheryl Crow just doesn't poop?

Jesusabdullah · Post by **Jesusabdullah** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:27 am

Sheryl Crow is a robot. She poops nice and tidy radioactive pellets.

Noise Monkey · Post by **Noise Monkey** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:40 am

in that case, an entire sheet would actually be wasteful.