My Jaw Has Officially Drop-kicked itself.

Soap Soaperson · Post by **Soap Soaperson** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:32 pm

I know I could've just posted this in the sharing thread, but this needs its own topic. Oh my goodness.

http://imgs.c-r-y.com/uploads/Stu.jpg

It's a discarded Rugrats storyboard taken (apparently) from one of the creators' livejournals. I guess someone got tired of writing little kiddie shows.

Blahsville! · Post by **Blahsville!** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:35 pm

Wait, what?

Oh. My. God.

Post by **Mercury Hat** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:38 pm

That link came up in a recent thread on SA about adult situations in kid's shows.

Stolen from that thread:

Steve Ressel's Livejournal came out of the closet to say:

A Storyboard Jam isn't common on shows that allow people to get out frustrations in the actual work, but on cutie kid shows, everyone draws naked women going bonkers on giant cocks in their spare time. Inevitably, through loathing of the project, they start a storyboard jam where a continuous story evolves from artist to artist as they hand around the papers. Everyone gets a turn to do their worst with the characters.

At Klasky, on Rugrats, they started this Jam in 1998 I think. The first page had Angelica being a bitch to Tommy, so Tommy gets her a drink in the kitchen and puts in dog food and draino, then toddles back to Angelica. This is where the story should have heated up, but I saw someone was intervening. I found this lone page yesterday and can't find the rest. When the Jam was handed to me I disgustedly pushed it away, and after seeing it unattended on another artist's desk for 2 days I had the idea to step up the lameness a notch by having Stu come in and be utterly abusive to everyone. The artists who saw my treatment of the characters after their refined, cultured story were getting pissed...

I began the next page (I was on a roll, most people did 3 or 4 panels and I was doing 12 or so in a fervor of home filth) with a close up of Stu's crotch (on model) and then a cut away showing his entire pelvis is in fact two tight and well rounded testicles with a tiny cock dangling from above. Lightening was bouncing around and words appeared saying 'BALLS OF THUNDER!', or something to that effect. After that, the next artists really took it to it's low as Angelica's hands came in to stroke Stu's balls and then incest sex scenes flew all over the pages. I was disgusted, even, when I saw what had become of the comic.

Someone was taking the things between buildings, to dump it on the Thornberry crew when an executive snooty-draws producer saw it, was disturbed, and confiscated the jam... and thus it ended.

Locster · Post by **Locster** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:19 pm

wow..

Protectmyballs · Post by **Protectmyballs** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 7:06 pm

Wasn't there some story years ago about a couple of Disney animators making a porno of Mickey and Minnie for Walt's birthday, then they both got fired and pretty much lost hope of ever being hired again after he saw it?

CJBurgandy · Post by **CJBurgandy** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 7:15 pm

I know a lot of the people who work at Dreamworks used to work for Disney. It's one of the reasons there are so many stabs at Disney Cartoons in Shrek and Shrek 2. Jaded ex-employees given a chance to stab back.

The Original Theater Release of "the Rescuers" had a breif flash of nudity. They caught it though and it was edited out before it was release to tape.

BOMC · Post by **BOMC** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:09 pm

cjburgandy wrote: The Original Theater Release of "the Rescuers" had a breif flash of nudity. They caught it though and it was edited out before it was release to tape.

from what i heard, they did release the version with the nudity on video, and had to recall it... i could be wrong, though

JPSloan · Post by **JPSloan** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:17 pm

BOMC wrote:
cjburgandy wrote: The Original Theater Release of "the Rescuers" had a breif flash of nudity. They caught it though and it was edited out before it was release to tape.
from what i heard, they did release the version with the nudity on video, and had to recall it... i could be wrong, though

They did. I watched it. Don't know about the recall.

Post by **Mercury Hat** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:22 pm

There's a Snopes article I'm too lazy to dig out, but Disney may have offered to replace the video.

But the first person who claims that Simba spells out "SEX" in the Lion King, that the priest in Little Mermaid has a boner, or that Aladdin tells good teenagers to "take off their clothes" is gonna get sucker punched by me.

K-Dawg · Post by **K-Dawg** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:28 pm

hmmm do I want to be sucker punched or not?

CJBurgandy · Post by **CJBurgandy** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:41 pm

Mercury_Hat wrote:There's a Snopes article I'm too lazy to dig out, but Disney may have offered to replace the video.

But the first person who claims that Simba spells out "SEX" in the Lion King, that the priest in Little Mermaid has a boner, or that Aladdin tells good teenagers to "take off their clothes" is gonna get sucker punched by me.

I know Snoops stated that the Priest boner was false, it's like his knee cap or sometime. BUt I saw a new show thtat was talking about this stuff and I guess the actual script for Aladdin says "Good Tiger, get up and go"

I think the people who sit around trying to find perverted things in the background of disney movies are not only messed up, but they're looking in the wrong place.... if they really wanted to catch Disney at perversion they should be complaining about Poccahantas (sp?).... no 12 year old has breasts like that. Even mine weren't that big at 12.... sickos.

JPSloan · Post by **JPSloan** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:44 pm

cjburgandy wrote: I think the people who sit around trying to find perverted things in the background of disney movies are not only messed up, but they're looking in the wrong place

It's called "Sexual Repression".

IVstudios · Post by **IVstudios** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:48 pm

Mercury_Hat wrote:But the first person who claims that Simba spells out "SEX" in the Lion King,

I heard someplace that it was actually "SFX," a small tribute to the company that did the sound for the movie or something. It might just be an urban legend as well though.

Luprand · Post by **Luprand** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:52 pm

cjburgandy wrote: if they really wanted to catch Disney at perversion they should be complaining about Poccahantas (sp?).... no 12 year old has breasts like that. Even mine weren't that big at 12.... sickos.

The way I'd heard it, Disney added ten years to Pocahontas' age and took them from John Smith's so the romance could be more plausible. That way, they wouldn't have to explain the tradition involved in Pocahontas saving Smith's life; it "makes sense" given that they're both 20-something lovers.

--Sij

Chaos Cricket · Post by **Chaos Cricket** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 11:41 pm

Historical accuracy? Faith to the original story? We can't have that--this is a Disney film!

JexKerome · Post by **JexKerome** » Tue Nov 16, 2004 12:52 am

Well, I remember reading a Time (or Newsweek,.. I forget which, but it was a respected news mag) that had a feature on Aladdin. A large part of the article was about the Disney women had grown hotter since the little Mermaid, and in fact mentioned a picture hanging around the Disney studios of Ariel taking off her bra in defiance of the establishment.

Van Douchebag · Post by **Van Douchebag** » Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:07 am

BAH HA HA HA HA!
Who knew children's programming could be so fun?

Protectmyballs · Post by **Protectmyballs** » Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:10 am

Mercury_Hat wrote:There's a Snopes article I'm too lazy to dig out, but Disney may have offered to replace the video.

But the first person who claims that Simba spells out "SEX" in the Lion King, that the priest in Little Mermaid has a boner, or that Aladdin tells good teenagers to "take off their clothes" is gonna get sucker punched by me.

What about the giant wang on the castle on the little mermaids box cover?

Nyke · Post by **Nyke** » Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:38 am

protectmyballs wrote:
Mercury_Hat wrote:There's a Snopes article I'm too lazy to dig out, but Disney may have offered to replace the video.

But the first person who claims that Simba spells out "SEX" in the Lion King, that the priest in Little Mermaid has a boner, or that Aladdin tells good teenagers to "take off their clothes" is gonna get sucker punched by me.
What about the giant wang on the castle on the little mermaids box cover?

Snopes article. It was a whoopsie.

Soap Soaperson · Post by **Soap Soaperson** » Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:53 am

Yes, if I recall - the artist pulled an all-nighter to finish the picture, and made a wang. My state capitol building actually has a similar problem.

http://www.gatortrax.com/tours/images/tallahassee.jpg

I never noticed anything wrong with its design until my psychology professor made sure we all realized how phallic it was. [edit: Because of the domes resembling testicles, and the tall center part of the building resembling a giant wang, etc.]

THANK YOU, TEACHER. Now I can't drive down that road without giggling!