Page 1 of 4
The Timeless Question
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:30 pm
by Collapse
Choose. Support. Now.
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:47 pm
by Jim North
System Shock 2.
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:06 pm
by Joel Fagin
Bah. Halo's just a first-person shooter. Or Halo 1 was, anyway. It wasn't anything really new, kind samey and plagerised numerous sources - not least of which Ringworld - for it's plot. Anyone who games on a PC would've seen most of it many times before.
Out of the choices to hand, I'd have to pick Halflife although I haven't seen it yet. Normally, however, I'd agree with Jim.
- Joel Fagin
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:40 pm
by Luprand
And now I have this awful image of Commander Chief or whatever his name is doing the rishathra ...
--Sij
Why can't we all just get along?
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:05 am
by Cope
We can't choose both?

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:19 am
by Theamazingsquad
Actually, I'm quite looking forward to the new Tiger woods 2005....
Or something....
Seriously though, I'd probably pick Half life 2.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:35 am
by YarpsDat
Jim North wrote:System Shock 2.
System Shock 1.
I mean. I liked System Shock 2... but lack of the puzzles and cyberspace...
SS1 rocked really hard because of them, if they were is SS2 the game would be like, legendary. Without them, it was just a good game.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:16 am
by JexKerome
Yes, Halo is just a shooter, but what a shooter it is. It never tried to be anything but a shooter. Halflife is also just a shooter, and virtually identical to Halo: lots of action with a scripted storyline, both of which knocked my socks off first time around. Halo's claim to fame is not on the PC but rather on the console world, where nothing like it had come before and all pretenders to its crown have fallen short.
For me, Halo 2 is the game to wait for since I won't have to hideously upgrade my Xbox just to play (which is the reason I bought the Xbox) nor have to deal with cheaters on Live (Internet) play, since a modded Xbox cannot access Live and cheaters are quickly pointed out by the community and actively shunned/kicked out of games. I can also have some friends pop in and play split-screen (I own a 31" just for that purpose); something which cannot be done on a PC without either a) major planning beforehand, or b) major chaos setting up. Not to mention a) doesn't always eliminates b). Nothing sadder than having someone show up with a system that struggles to run Tetris yet insists it can play Doom 3.
SS1 I missed, and SS2 I missed too because of the upgrade issue. A friend who has it, though, told me it sucked that all weapons eventually disintegrated. No, my money for revolutionary FPS gameplay goes to Deus Ex; each situation has at least two different ways to be solved and it's really up to you how well you do them. In Halo and Half Life, you had to solve things the one way the designers had tought it up or you couldn't proceed.
So, bring on the Master Chief!
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:27 am
by Esoterik
Halo 2 looks pretty good, but so far I'm enjoying Half-Life 2. Well, Counter-Strike: Source, anyway. The physics are pretty incredible.
EDIT: Yeah, and System Shock 2 rocks hard.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:43 am
by Collapse
Yes, Halo is just a shooter, but what a shooter it is. It never tried to be anything but a shooter. Halflife is also just a shooter, and virtually identical to Halo: lots of action with a scripted storyline, both of which knocked my socks off first time around. Halo's claim to fame is not on the PC but rather on the console world, where nothing like it had come before and all pretenders to its crown have fallen short.
What?!? Half-Life is
nothing like Halo. All you do in Halo is run and shoot. Half-Life contains a plethora of puzzles to work out. It's got a much wider variety of weapons and enemies. It ranges across a wide variety of environments. It has a much more complex plot, that isn't borrowed from a half-dozen books.
...personally, I think Perfect Dark (N64) beats the crap out of Halo in terms of gameplay, both single- and multiplayer.
I think Halo is
fun, but it's not that special, and there are a lot of games that are a lot more fun.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:46 am
by Prettydragoon
Civ 2.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:49 am
by JPSloan
M.U.L.E.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:10 am
by Esoterik
November 16th guys!

HL2 is finally done.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:25 am
by Jim North
YarpsDat wrote:Jim North wrote:System Shock 2.
System Shock 1.
I've never gotten to play the original System Shock, sadly, though not for lack of trying. It's almost like every single copy of the game completely disappears whenever I try to look for it.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:27 am
by [geoduck]
JPSloan wrote:M.U.L.E.
That or NetHack.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:35 pm
by Dutch!
Haven't played either...
That's this thread AND the Sims thread I can't participate in...
I don't fit in here, do I?
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:43 pm
by Isukiyomi
Haven't played either and I don't plan to

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:34 pm
by Life Imitating Art
Half-Life, for my money. Which I won't be spending anyway, since I don't have any.

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 5:55 pm
by Luprand
I tried playing Halo and got severe motion sickness.
I watched someone else play Half-Life and got severe motion sickness.
I rode in the backseat of a PT Cruiser and got mild motion sickness.
I am a sad, pathetic little man.
--Sij
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:19 pm
by Warren
[geoduck] wrote:JPSloan wrote:M.U.L.E.
That or NetHack.
M.U.L.E. On the Commodore. No substitute.