Topics which don't fit comfortably in any of the other forums go here. Spamming is not tolerated.
Forum rules
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
I would agree that women are crazy, but that's why I like them.
Oh, they are also very hawt!
However, I find that I enjoy the crazy stuff women do just as long as I'm NOT pursuing a relationship with them. That's when it crosses that thin line from crazy to insane, and things tend to go BOOM.
JTigerclaw wrote:I would agree that women are crazy, but that's why I like them.
Oh, they are also very hawt!
However, I find that I enjoy the crazy stuff women do just as long as I'm NOT pursuing a relationship with them. That's when it crosses that thin line from crazy to insane, and things tend to go BOOM.
(or maybe it was just that one, I dunno.)
I dunno, I like my women a bit bubbly and...random, I guess you could say. Much more fun to be around than Madame Botox, and her twins Sili and Cone. However, there WAS that one stalker one...yeah...that one crossed some sort of line.
Killbert-Robby wrote:I dunno, I like my women a bit bubbly and...random, I guess you could say. Much more fun to be around than Madame Botox, and her twins Sili and Cone. However, there WAS that one stalker one...yeah...that one crossed some sort of line.
I would agree with you on that. Randomness is a good trait, but then there's those few who overdo it, or are just plain nuts, and you can usually tell who those are. It's especially bad when one woman is both a nut and an idiot. Had it happen, never care to have it happen again.
JTigerclaw wrote:It's especially bad when one woman is both a nut and an idiot. Had it happen, never care to have it happen again.
Been there, done that, tempted to try a lobotomy to see if I can get rid of the memories.
All the various genders have their own special brand of crazy. I just happen to find the womanly brand of lunacy to be endearing. In, y'know, small controlled doses.
Nasty like, "Bad ass bad boy who doesn't take shit from anyone" or nasty like, "Rarely bathes and cleans the slime off his skin with a squeege"?
Well gee Kolter, tempting as that squeege situation sounds, I'm going to opt to choose the first option.
You never know. There were these people on Jerry Springer a while ago who got off on being covered naked in garbage. They were in their underwear all but screwing on stage covered in stink, their slime and offal covered bodies slipping past one another in a sexily choreographed, pungent smelling display of refuse-coated erotica.
Crossfire: "Thank you! That explains it very nicely, and in a language that someone other than a physicist can understand..."
Denial is not falsification. You can't avoid a fact just because you don't like it.
"Data" is not the plural of "anecdote"
rkolter wrote:
Nasty like, "Bad ass bad boy who doesn't take shit from anyone" or nasty like, "Rarely bathes and cleans the slime off his skin with a squeege"?
Well gee Kolter, tempting as that squeege situation sounds, I'm going to opt to choose the first option.
You never know. There were these people on Jerry Springer a while ago who got off on being covered naked in garbage. They were in their underwear all but screwing on stage covered in stink, their slime and offal covered bodies slipping past one another in a sexily choreographed, pungent smelling display of refuse-coated erotica.
Wow, you got me there. You're right. Nothing gets me more fired up than wading through community tips. Wow, nelly. Hold me back from that banana peel and rotting tea bags.
blackaby wrote:
Well gee Kolter, tempting as that squeege situation sounds, I'm going to opt to choose the first option.
You never know. There were these people on Jerry Springer a while ago who got off on being covered naked in garbage. They were in their underwear all but screwing on stage covered in stink, their slime and offal covered bodies slipping past one another in a sexily choreographed, pungent smelling display of refuse-coated erotica.
Wow, you got me there. You're right. Nothing gets me more fired up than wading through community tips. Wow, nelly. Hold me back from that banana peel and rotting tea bags.
See? I thought so...
Crossfire: "Thank you! That explains it very nicely, and in a language that someone other than a physicist can understand..."
Denial is not falsification. You can't avoid a fact just because you don't like it.
"Data" is not the plural of "anecdote"
rkolter wrote:You never know. There were these people on Jerry Springer a while ago who got off on being covered naked in garbage. They were in their underwear all but screwing on stage covered in stink, their slime and offal covered bodies slipping past one another in a sexily choreographed, pungent smelling display of refuse-coated erotica.
rkolter wrote:You never know. There were these people on Jerry Springer a while ago who got off on being covered naked in garbage. They were in their underwear all but screwing on stage covered in stink, their slime and offal covered bodies slipping past one another in a sexily choreographed, pungent smelling display of refuse-coated erotica.
Eeew, eew, ew!!!
Wow, it's almost as if the disgust emoticon was born to accompany Kolter's post.
"I've always been fascinated by failure!" -Charlie Brown