Computer Graphic Cartoons: The Next Thing?

Topics which don't fit comfortably in any of the other forums go here. Spamming is not tolerated.
Forum rules
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
User avatar
AsterAzul
Regular Poster
Posts: 999
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: finding my way home
Contact:

Computer Graphic Cartoons: The Next Thing?

Post by AsterAzul »

I was always a big fan of computer graphics and stuff like that as a kid. I was so excited by the continuing developments in 3D computer art and such, and was frustrated everything was going so slowly. (I mean, come on, 3-dimensional coordinates. What's so hard about it? Geez! Where's my 3D drawing program already?)

But now that we've actually gotten to the point where this stuff is commonplace, I'm more irritated than interested. People are starting to use 3D graphics systems to create cartoons (I refer to animation, mostly) and such without drawing them, and movies are rampant with bad CGI. Is cartooning soon to be replaced by the CG wave?
Image

User avatar
Humbug
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1772
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 3:05 am
Location: Not here.
Contact:

Post by Humbug »

I hope not, I love classical animation. And being an animator myself, I feel the pain. :(

User avatar
Anywherebuthere
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: North-da-fucking-kota
Contact:

Re: Computer Graphic Cartoons: The Next Thing?

Post by Anywherebuthere »

AsterAzul wrote:I was always a big fan of computer graphics and stuff like that as a kid. I was so excited by the continuing developments in 3D computer art and such, and was frustrated everything was going so slowly. (I mean, come on, 3-dimensional coordinates. What's so hard about it? Geez! Where's my 3D drawing program already?)

But now that we've actually gotten to the point where this stuff is commonplace, I'm more irritated than interested. People are starting to use 3D graphics systems to create cartoons (I refer to animation, mostly) and such without drawing them, and movies are rampant with bad CGI. Is cartooning soon to be replaced by the CG wave?
I thought disney was SHUTTING DOWN their 2D studios. The last hand animated film they were going to release was Brother Bear.

However, I also remember hearing, and I kid you not, Pixar was planning on STARTING a hand animated devision.

User avatar
PieceOfSkunk
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1350
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: DFW TX USA

Post by PieceOfSkunk »

Disney shutting down its 2D animation is a pretty stupid, short-sighted move. I read a very good (long) article about the history of Disney animation and its struggles here, and it seems to me that a move like that will only bite them in the ass later.

User avatar
Mr.Bob
:(
:(
Posts: 6895
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 4:12 am
Location: A box
Contact:

Post by Mr.Bob »

Old school animation for ever!

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Re: Computer Graphic Cartoons: The Next Thing?

Post by McDuffies »

anywherebuthere wrote: However, I also remember hearing, and I kid you not, Pixar was planning on STARTING a hand animated devision.
That's, like, the best news EVER!

Well, when CGI started to get into animated cartoons, I didn't really like it. Even now I think that first CGI movies were too much into mimikhing the real world instead of creating the world that was more suitable for the means given (Dreamworks still does). But luckily, the learned along the way and got a hang of it. After all, first Disney's long animated movies were lacking in many ways too, and first cartoons as well (anyone seen old "Mutt and Jeff"?)
Of course, classic animation will never die. Nothing ever dies. After all, Disney, Pixar and Dreamworks aren't the only studios doing animation in the world.

User avatar
AsterAzul
Regular Poster
Posts: 999
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: finding my way home
Contact:

Post by AsterAzul »

I still don't like computer animation, even after seeing the Incredibles. (Which was an awesome movie.)
It just looks cheap and unfitting to me. But that's more my instinctual resentment of turning times than anything else.

*Goes to dig out his dusty NES, records, and old CDs.*
Ah, I remember the day I bought my first John Taylor CD. Still have it, in fact. "The Compact Disc Digital Audio System offers the best possible sound reproduction - on a small convenient disc
Image

User avatar
War
Grr
Posts: 3018
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 2:26 pm
Contact:

Post by War »

CGI comics are crap. Mostly they reside in the uncanny valley. If you're striving for realism, go out and make a photo comic. Comics aren't about making stuff look as real as possible.

Pixar got it right. It's not about going for realism, we've got actors for that.

And have you ever tried using 3D Studio Max? Working in 3D ain't easy.

User avatar
TheSuburbanLetdown
Destroyer of Property Value
Posts: 12714
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: explod

Post by TheSuburbanLetdown »

I rather enjoy CGI movies, but I think it's a terrible idea to replace traditional animation with it. Disney shutting down their animation is foolish; their latest failures with animated movies had a lot to do with the content, not the medium it was in. A bad movie is a bad movie, period.

On an aside, "The Incredibles" is one my favorite movies ever. It did everything right: casting, writing, story progression, chracters, soundtrack, excellent animation, everything. It even had a good mesasge without being cheesey and/or preachy. And I believe this movie would've worked as a regualr animated feature as well because the content is there.
Image

User avatar
AsterAzul
Regular Poster
Posts: 999
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: finding my way home
Contact:

Post by AsterAzul »

My first experiences with 3D drawing involved POV-ray, so I have a pretty healthy respect for the difficulties involved. I was actually pretty surprised at the sudden popularity of 3D art and such, because I didn't recognize that it had gotten easier to develop 3D art.

One thing I'm waiting for is software that has more sophisticated transformation elements to bring to the table. Ragdoll and the new clothing textures were pretty impressive. (I was impressed when they started using shadows, so it doesn't take much to impress me.) But a lot of the cheaper animation has pretty poor handling of axes of motion and the like. Animation still has the advantage of being stylistic.
I guess they really are getting there, though, because they had some pretty impressive animation in The Incredibles.

I rather agree about the uncanny valley, though. The almost-human graphics in some animation kinda freaks me out.
Image

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by McDuffies »

On an aside, "The Incredibles" is one my favorite movies ever. It did everything right: casting, writing, story progression, chracters, soundtrack, excellent animation, everything.
Even the closing credits.

Gau dog
Regular Poster
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:01 pm
Contact:

Post by Gau dog »

Disney did shut down their 2D studios. Both in Florida and Burbank. The only 2D movie production studio Disney has left is in Australia making the "cheapquels". Dreamworks shut their 2D studio too. I'm don't have anything against CG as a medium, but when it's taking over traditional 2D animation, it's a sad thing.
Last edited by Gau dog on Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
In some ways, dogs are superior to men.
http://www.jamesmarstudio.com

User avatar
Dotty
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 2434
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Drunk!
Contact:

Post by Dotty »

I like disney and everything, but closing down the 2d studios is flat out retarded. Hand drawn, and old school animation is the stuff that still rocks my boxers. Reboot and The Beast Wars, heck, even Shadow Raiders was pretty cool stuff.....but I still love the hand drawn stuff more.

War's right. Pixar knows where it's at.
Caught in the headlamp glare of your own blinding vanity/Mesmerised by the stare of your shallow personality
Gorging the junk food of flattery you drag your fat ego around/Everyone floored by the battering you give to whoever's around
Oh Narcissus you petulant child admiring yourself in the curve of my eyes/Oh Narcissus you angel beguiled unsated by self you do nothing but die

User avatar
Subhuman
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:21 am
Location: Rhythm Nation
Contact:

Post by Subhuman »

PeppermintAftertaste wrote:"The Incredibles" is one my favorite movies ever. It did everything right: casting, writing, story progression, chracters, soundtrack, excellent animation, everything. It even had a good mesasge without being cheesey and/or preachy. And I believe this movie would've worked as a regualr animated feature as well because the content is there.
Replace "The Incredibles" with "Finding Nemo" and I totally agree. (The Incredibles was very good, but it just felt kinda...thin.)

User avatar
Specterz
Regular Poster
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by Specterz »

I just loved the first Shrek (and the second), but mainly because of its humor, and not particularly because of the great animation or anything. So I suppose it could have worked just as well with hand-drawn animation.
Boy, that would have been different, though...
Image
<a href="http://gamingalive.comicgenesis.com">Gaming Alive</a> updates TT!

User avatar
Sketch286
Regular Poster
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:26 pm
Contact:

Post by Sketch286 »

i miss hand-animated stuff, it had a better feel to it.

User avatar
Turi
Regular Poster
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Computer Graphic Cartoons: The Next Thing?

Post by Turi »

AsterAzul wrote:I mean, come on, 3-dimensional coordinates. What's so hard about it?
I have a friend, who studies computer science. He tried to explain to me the mathemathics behind 3D... I can only go "wow" for the people who creates 3D engines. They are using numbers that can only be defined in R^4 (outside the real numbers (R), outside the complex numbers (R^2, like the square root of a negative number), outside R^3, which I have no idea of what describes, and into the fourth dimension)... :o :o :o

On Disney shutting down their 3D studios: That was about the stupidest thing they could have ever done. They shut down the 2D BEFORE making sure that Pixar would continue to work 3D for them, which - as we all know- they wouldn't...
Image

User avatar
Sketch286
Regular Poster
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:26 pm
Contact:

Post by Sketch286 »

yeah, just looking at them try to work maya makes me like, bleed out my ears......not really though
that program is crazy

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by McDuffies »

gau dog wrote:Dreamworks shut their 2D studio too.
Finally a good news.

User avatar
The Neko
A Blithe ray of Schadenfreude
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: New York City

Post by The Neko »

I think 3D is becoming popular is because it's much easier and cheaper to produce, and it's the current fad. I think people will become tired of it eventually.
jag saknar självförtroende

Locked