Water/explosion effect

Think your comic can improve? Whether it's art or writing, composition or colouring, feel free to ask here! Critique and commentary welcome.

Post Reply
User avatar
Webkilla
Regular Poster
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Denmark - land of LARP and vikings
Contact:

Water/explosion effect

Post by Webkilla »

Image

this will appear in my comic soon... (just an FYI)


I'm just wondering - what do yall think of the water effect? I was going for a "homg-pulse-thingy pushing away water from continent" kinda effect

and mind you, this was drawn from scratch - there aren't any reference pics for this kinda stuff :p


does it look like ocean(s) being forced away from a continent to you?

User avatar
Warofwinds
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:46 pm
Location: Beneath stormy skies
Contact:

Post by Warofwinds »

It's a cool explosion for sure, but to me it doesn't look like water. Looks more like a bubble popping, or a balloon. Kinda like plastic. I think it's 'cause of the jagged edges. A water explosion would have rounded edges. On a small scale, I'm thinking a drop of water hitting more water might give you the effect you want:

http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Michae ... 21258.jpeg

Still looks mad cool though.
-Kez
ImageImageImage

Wp
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1335
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 9:08 am
Contact:

Post by Wp »

The jagged edges are definitely giving it a more plant-like appearance, especially with the greenish water. And there are no land masses on that planet except for that top part. Is that intentional? Also, the pulse should not look the same on both sides of the planet.

User avatar
Webkilla
Regular Poster
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Denmark - land of LARP and vikings
Contact:

Post by Webkilla »

warwind, one thing you have to keep in mind:

up close water is round and bubbly - but from the distance we're looking at the pic...

its from space - not up close - you cant see fine waterdroplets at that distance.

still, a ballon popping? I can see the similarity.... hmmm

User avatar
Aiken
Regular Poster
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:30 am
Location: Lincoln, England
Contact:

Post by Aiken »

If it's in space, then why can we hear the boom?
<a href="http://sci.comicgenesis.com"><img border="0" src="http://sci.comicgenesis.com/images/sigbanner.jpg" width="282" height="70">

User avatar
Rhenny
Regular Poster
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:51 am
Location: Heartland
Contact:

Post by Rhenny »

The circles seem to few, also I would add fragmented circles for the explosion, and a few more ebbs in the flow..here's a good pic to work from.

http://brelaxed.tripod.com/

Googled it up..

Rhen

User avatar
Warofwinds
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1088
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:46 pm
Location: Beneath stormy skies
Contact:

Post by Warofwinds »

webkilla wrote:warwind, one thing you have to keep in mind:

up close water is round and bubbly - but from the distance we're looking at the pic...

its from space - not up close - you cant see fine waterdroplets at that distance.

still, a ballon popping? I can see the similarity.... hmmm
Hehe, and that is why I said "on a small scale." ;) The unjagged edges hold true both for that small droplet and an entire ocean. Water is cohesive. It sticks together. It's liquid too, which means that it does not produce points. As ice, you can get edges. But water is soft. That was my point :D
-Kez
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Webkilla
Regular Poster
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Denmark - land of LARP and vikings
Contact:

Post by Webkilla »

hmm...

what if... the water being pushed into space freezes? that would make it jagged and stuff?

(i cant arse myself into redoing the pic...)

User avatar
Siabur
Regular Poster
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:44 pm
Location: Fairview, a place where things that are maybe...
Contact:

Post by Siabur »

It reminds me of that apple getting shot and the bullet captured in the pic. I think it all comes down to what the reference before it was. Is there a panel prior that shows the "before"? I think that would be more helpful to it and then the water exploding would be understood. In my opinion.
Friction Fit Theatre. Updates 7 days a week after 3pm Colorado time.
Image

User avatar
Webkilla
Regular Poster
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Denmark - land of LARP and vikings
Contact:

Post by Webkilla »

no large references to the planet, but this page here has a shot of it, from a different angle mind you:

http://psitech.comicgen.com/d/20070205.html

User avatar
Sketchywallflowr
Regular Poster
Posts: 474
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Sexpot Central

Post by Sketchywallflowr »

Is it water escaping a planet or just a continent? Because if it's a planet, then you wonldn't have round in the middle and explosion on the ends. Because planets are spheres, it would be pushing out from ALL angles. I think that's what is making it look so bubble-like. And there are two shine-spots, which there would be billions of shine spots or no shine spots. I think the major dilemma is that you're making the water as a whole, circular uniti when it's actually a bunch of smaller, non-circle units.
And don't forget, it's all pushing outward.

A good reference?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1m1BpUIG-sQ
Need me to kill someone? I'm a hired assasin in my spare time.

User avatar
Redtech
Regular Poster
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 am
Location: 'Terror central' London
Contact:

Post by Redtech »

The water just doesn't have the right colour for me.

A very original "bang" though. I tried blowing up a planet and ended up with an egg. D:
Sometimes the failed experiments are the ones that don't try to kill you
Image

User avatar
Rkolter
Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
Posts: 16399
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 4:34 am
Location: It's equally probable that I'm everywhere.
Contact:

Post by Rkolter »

webkilla wrote:hmm...

what if... the water being pushed into space freezes? that would make it jagged and stuff?

(i cant arse myself into redoing the pic...)
It definately looks plantlike to me for another reason - it blew out at the poles - an explosion in a water bubble would have quickly infused the water with gas, turning it opaque, and blasting the entire bubble at once, possibly with jagged effects, but all over the surface of a growing sphere, more like an explosion of a star.

Image

In space, the water would have frozen, and then the explosion would have shattered the entire thing in one go. You might get a blast like the one you've shown here, but the circumfrence of the bubble would be cracked and shattered like safety glass, and in any case fogged to the point of being opaque.

This looks more like a pea overfilled with propane or some other transparent, flammable gas, and then poked at both ends and set alight.

It's a very, very cool picture though - just not a watery explosion.
Image Image ImageImage
Crossfire: "Thank you! That explains it very nicely, and in a language that someone other than a physicist can understand..."

Denial is not falsification. You can't avoid a fact just because you don't like it.
"Data" is not the plural of "anecdote"

User avatar
Swikan
Regular Poster
Posts: 698
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Swikan »

You've really captured an explosive event, but I don't think water when I see it either. I definitely think more shockwaves are in order as Rhenny said above.

Perhaps a more "cloudy" effect.. you know.. water vapor? I remember seeing pics of mines going off in WW2 in the ocean and it looked very much like one going off on land, just.. cloudier.

User avatar
Jdalton
Regular Poster
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: 1 hr east of Vancouver
Contact:

Post by Jdalton »

Things that explode in space don't have rings. Rings only happen when things collapse, like debris falling into a black hole or dust orbiting a planet and forming a ring around it. I know, every space movie ever has rings around exploding things, but that's only because they look cool- not because the special effects people know what they're talking about.
Jonathon Dalton
Image

Post Reply