Manga vs Everyone Else

For discussions, announcements, non-technical questions and anything else comics-related or otherwise that doesn't fit in any of the other categories.

Do you prefer manga webcomics to any other style?

Yes
6
10%
No
52
90%
 
Total votes: 58

User avatar
BloodKnight
Regular Poster
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Post by BloodKnight »

Hell see the Ralph Bakshi movie "Wizards" and you will see an amazing story done with cheap techniques because a budget is only so much.
I hope you remember that when the movie was made, there wasn't much budget to begin with for animation. Most american and japanese cartoons didn't have much to begin with. Plus Bakshi, although a talented animator, is one hell of a shitty director. Remember Cool World, Lord o the Rings, Fritz the Cat, or Spice City? Yeesh. Well animated above standards at the time but ack...let me write for his movies next time.

Yes, I've seen Wizards. Interesting, but I think it was poorly done. "We must destroy the projector of hitler to stop the army of mutants." Oooookaaay...

Plus Wizards' world and character, especially with one character design, Avatar, was taken from a comic. Can't recall which one, but I'll find it if you really want me to.
- Mark Iradian
Writer of Chronicles of Garas (A dark tech fantasy webcomic)
Image
Visit my LiveJournal

User avatar
TheSuburbanLetdown
Destroyer of Property Value
Posts: 12714
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: explod

Post by TheSuburbanLetdown »

Cool World was horrible. I never saw Fritz the Cat, but I know Crumb (who created the character) did not want this movie to be made, and he was so upset with this film that he gave Fritz the Cat a definitive death scene in a comic not to long after.
Image

User avatar
BloodKnight
Regular Poster
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Post by BloodKnight »

PeppermintAfterlife wrote:Cool World was horrible. I never saw Fritz the Cat, but I know Crumb (who created the character) did not want this movie to be made, and he was so upset with this film that he gave Fritz the Cat a definitive death scene in a comic not to long after.
Yep. Icepick to the head.
- Mark Iradian
Writer of Chronicles of Garas (A dark tech fantasy webcomic)
Image
Visit my LiveJournal

User avatar
Godoftarot
Regular Poster
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
Contact:

Post by Godoftarot »

I love manga, I really do. But I don't find I prefer it as far as webcomics go. Although the manga style really does appeal to me a lot, one of the reasons I have so much of it is that you can get them in books of 6-8 issues for about ten books. You can't do that with too many Western comics. With webcomics, most of them are free, so it's a lot easier to get into all sorts of other styles.

I'm actually, despite appearances, not that big into anime. I like manga (as I stated above) but my anime collection is pretty paltry. Even if I had more money for it, I'm just not excited by the notion of sitting down and watching a ton of it. I don't generally have things like posters and wallcrolls and t-shirts. I have one wallscroll that hasn't graced my walls in years, a deck of cards with art from Magic Knight Rayearth on it, and a notebook and poster from my favorite Manga, Mars. I think spending money on all the extra junk that comes along with anime is generally a waste.

And it wasn't actually through anime or manga that I came to love the style so much. A friend of mine, before I even began drawing, did stuff in that style. At 11 years old she was already so fantastic, and she used watercolors. She was the one who encouraged me to start drawing, which was one of the reasons I chose the style I did. Goodness only knows if that will change as time goes on. But I don't think manga/anime style webcomics are better than others. In fact, while there are some amazingly good ones, a good deal of them fall into simply "average".
http://godoftarot.keenspace.com
God of Tarot: Giving new meaning to the phrase "Life sucks and then you die."

User avatar
TheGoobla
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1831
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: Your anus. (That's how you do a pun, right?)

Post by TheGoobla »

You know what style I like? The good one. I don't care how the artist draws, what I care about is that the artist CAN draw. If someone draws shitty manga art, hey, guess what, they still draw shitty art. If someone draws good manga art, then hey, they draw good art! Call me old fashioned, but I tend to think that's somewhat more important.

User avatar
Godoftarot
Regular Poster
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
Contact:

Post by Godoftarot »

TheGoobla wrote:You know what style I like? The good one. I don't care how the artist draws, what I care about is that the artist CAN draw. If someone draws shitty manga art, hey, guess what, they still draw shitty art. If someone draws good manga art, then hey, they draw good art! Call me old fashioned, but I tend to think that's somewhat more important.
Except that "good" is a fairly loosely defined word. Just because you think something is good doesn't mean someone else does, and vice versa.
http://godoftarot.keenspace.com
God of Tarot: Giving new meaning to the phrase "Life sucks and then you die."

Wp
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1335
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 9:08 am
Contact:

Post by Wp »

I'm pretty sure you know what he means.

User avatar
LAGtheNoggin
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 2532
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: the sea side
Contact:

Post by LAGtheNoggin »

Sonic was my childhood idol. Sonic is Japanese. Therefore I must draw Japanese.

Actually that's a complete lie, Sonic The Comic (The British one) was my idol, so I'm all happy where I am ^.^

I do have great respect for a lot of Japanese artists though, if they draw good, they draw good. Good being a grasp of perspective, proportion and whatnot. There are styles that I don't like but I still respect them if they know what they're doing.

User avatar
TheLoserHero
Regular Poster
Posts: 942
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:40 am
Location: Contrary to popular belief, the correct pronunciation of Jersey is "Joisey".
Contact:

Post by TheLoserHero »

Please don't make me choose. I like my art without the politics.
Image

User avatar
Prettysenshi
Bork Bork Bork
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:23 am
Location: Anywhere else but here....
Contact:

Post by Prettysenshi »

You're right, TheLoserHero. I didn't ask for anyone to chose sides. I just wanted to know if anyone else felt the same way I did. My goodness. I didn't know so many people had such different views like this, and with such good arguments too.

Oh well.
Last edited by Prettysenshi on Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Birdie
Keeps telling everyone stuff
Posts: 813
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:50 am
Location: With your mom
Contact:

Post by Birdie »

BloodKnight wrote: Yes, I've seen Wizards. Interesting, but I think it was poorly done. "We must destroy the projector of hitler to stop the army of mutants." Oooookaaay...

Plus Wizards' world and character, especially with one character design, Avatar, was taken from a comic. Can't recall which one, but I'll find it if you really want me to.
First, the movie is about how the destruction of the world can be avoided if we keep an eye on history and learn from hit (heck we're recreating the vietnam war in Iraq)

Also Bakshi had a similar budget to George Lucas when he first put out Starwars, and it's not about how much money you have, but how well you can manage it. People Bakshi worked with ended up doing incredible things later in their career. Example: John Kricfalusi worked on the Bakshi Project "Mighty Mouse" in the late 80s, and ends up starring in one of the most amazing cartoons Nickelodeon ever produced "Ren and Stimpy"

I have the Wizards DVD and it interviews Bakshi, and he goes on a whole list of people who worked for him in Wizards who end up doing things like Tom and Jerry, and Looney Tunes. His story as a director and animator is very interesting.
"I find the first strip on this site incredibly offensive and awful" - Scott Kurtz
SuperFightFight More Filling than Douche Juice!

User avatar
BOMC
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1339
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 5:13 am
Location: with your mom

Post by BOMC »

The only thing that bugs me about anime and manga is that, since (in its most simplified form) it is fairly easy to copy, a lot of new artists adopt it as their own style.

I did the same thing... when I was fairly young, I was introduced to Sailor Moon by a friend and soon my own style flew out the window. For years, I copied the drawings from Sailor Moon. Only recently have I realized it just doesn't work for me, and I found some other styles that did.

When I look at the art for a new webcomic, I ask myself two things:
1) Is it original?
2) is it done well?
It doesn't matter how complicated the style is: if it is at least somewhat original and the artist does that particular style well, then bravo to them.
-Grace (BOMC)

User avatar
The Neko
A Blithe ray of Schadenfreude
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: New York City

Post by The Neko »

Well, people have to realize that half of the animation brought over to the US is the "junky shit anime". These include series such as Sailor Moon, Inuyasha, and Dragon Ball Z. Also note that these are the most shallow and popular series, which tend to last hundreds of episodes. The longest-running series tend to have cheaper animation, and use tired styles. If you are looking for any quality, look for series that are intended to last from 13 - 26 episodes. Series that last longer are almost always of poor quality, since they are intended to be drawn out longer than they should. It is also expensive to use quality animation for series of that length, so they often cheap out. Inuyasha and Dragon Ball Z are the most poorly-animated series I've ever had the unfortunate experience of seeing. Then again, there are tons of series I've seen over there that are WORSE than that, and luckily they won't come over here. I hate how people assume that it's ALL good stuff.

Then again, there's a big difference between anime and manga. Anime has very little detail. The only money they spend is backgrounds. More often than not, these are produced almost entirely in Korea, which is not known for innovation (then again, Japan isn't an innovator either). Manga, on the other hand, has the potential to be unique. Looking at series like MPD Psycho, one can see that there's an opportunity to be unique.

However, what I see most in the webcomic world are cheap, half-assed imitations. The reason manga is so popular in the US is not the hair, it is not the huge eyes, the pointy faces and the lack of a mouth. In reality, it's the storytelling, and the quality of the drawings. They also mastered action sequences. However, half the time, people in the US completely miss this idea and instead go for the superficial elements. And this is why I hate web manga, it's not even close to what they're trying to imitate it, and it's not even attempting to innovate.
jag saknar självförtroende

User avatar
Godoftarot
Regular Poster
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
Contact:

Post by Godoftarot »

The Neko wrote:Well, people have to realize that half of the animation brought over to the US is the "junky shit anime". These include series such as Sailor Moon, Inuyasha, and Dragon Ball Z. Also note that these are the most shallow and popular series, which tend to last hundreds of episodes. The longest-running series tend to have cheaper animation, and use tired styles. If you are looking for any quality, look for series that are intended to last from 13 - 26 episodes. Series that last longer are almost always of poor quality, since they are intended to be drawn out longer than they should. It is also expensive to use quality animation for series of that length, so they often cheap out. Inuyasha and Dragon Ball Z are the most poorly-animated series I've ever had the unfortunate experience of seeing. Then again, there are tons of series I've seen over there that are WORSE than that, and luckily they won't come over here. I hate how people assume that it's ALL good stuff.

Then again, there's a big difference between anime and manga. Anime has very little detail. The only money they spend is backgrounds. More often than not, these are produced almost entirely in Korea, which is not known for innovation (then again, Japan isn't an innovator either). Manga, on the other hand, has the potential to be unique. Looking at series like MPD Psycho, one can see that there's an opportunity to be unique.

However, what I see most in the webcomic world are cheap, half-assed imitations. The reason manga is so popular in the US is not the hair, it is not the huge eyes, the pointy faces and the lack of a mouth. In reality, it's the storytelling, and the quality of the drawings. They also mastered action sequences. However, half the time, people in the US completely miss this idea and instead go for the superficial elements. And this is why I hate web manga, it's not even close to what they're trying to imitate it, and it's not even attempting to innovate.
You know...not everyone who draws with a manga look is trying to exactly copy manga. I mean, is that not something forumites complain about all the time? That people copy things exactly?
Why, when people take some of the elements they like from something, but don't copy that thing exactly, does it mean they miss the point completely? But if they copy it exactly, they're also not being innovative then, either! What makes you assume that everyone who likes the style wants to do exactly the same thing? Honestly, there's no point in making something your own if you do it exactly like everyone else.
And for another thing, why is it that only the Japanese can have their wacky ideas? And when anyone else has them they're copying the Japanese! That's what I can't stand about anime becoming popular in the U.S. I've always had outrageous ideas for things. And granted when I saw anime, I was relieved that I wasn't the only person in the world that had insane things in my head. But now if I come up with something even remotely similar to what's in an anime, people automatically say I'm copying. What, American's can't have an original thought too?
http://godoftarot.keenspace.com
God of Tarot: Giving new meaning to the phrase "Life sucks and then you die."

User avatar
Nightgaunt
Regular Poster
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:08 pm
Location: Washington State
Contact:

Post by Nightgaunt »

It seems to be a wide spectrum: there's anime and manga where the level of detail is astounding. There are some with great stories, and others that are complete crap. Note, however, that the same holds true for "western" comics as well.

Maybe it was just the mangas I was looking at, but I noticed an obscene overuse of action/speed lines. If an artist needs to rely heavily on those, then they aren't doing their job as storytellers, in my personal opinion.

Going with what The Neko said about anime in the U.S. being "junky shit anime," I think the real problem are the brain-dead kids that are the target demographic. As an example, I liked Evangelion (though it relly pisses me off how they had such great concepts but didn't develop them enough in the end - my biggest pet peeve of storytelling in general) and I wanted to purchase some of the manga. I went to Borders, and their entire manga section was the "original" right-to-left japanese format (which I refuse to buy for reasons I won't go into). Why? Because their target demographic is comprised of the kids who like that and buy that stuff(comic book stores aren't generally a whole lot better).

So, cheap crap is overly produced, and "junky shit anime" is imported because that is what sells. Damn punk-ass kids...
http://ruetheday.keenspace.com Banners? We don't need no stinkin' banners.

User avatar
Col
Cartoon Villain
Posts: 5089
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 9:40 am
Location: Uncertainty
Contact:

Post by Col »

It's always depressing when I go to a bookstore and see ten shelves of manga and only two shelves of western comics. Dangit, people need to learn there's good stuff here too.

User avatar
The Neko
A Blithe ray of Schadenfreude
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: New York City

Post by The Neko »

Col wrote:It's always depressing when I go to a bookstore and see ten shelves of manga and only two shelves of western comics. Dangit, people need to learn there's good stuff here too.
There is some good stuff here... but unfortunately it's just as cliched as the manga. I think manga is popular here because it's different than what we're used to. It's like how English stuff is popular over there.
jag saknar självförtroende

User avatar
Phact0rri
The Establishment (Moderator)
The Establishment (Moderator)
Posts: 5772
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: ????
Contact:

Post by Phact0rri »

I think that a lot of what you see on the web is western-manga so it would be evident to assume by statistics that there would be more of them on every list you go to. I don't prefer manga to any any other style, I like manga okay. But I think there is a lot of good work out there away from the manga.

The problem I have with webcomic manga is when people try to have thier art look like someone elses. this isn't just manga however. I think originality and creativity is what art is all about. I usually don't read comics if I go "this looks like this" with a few acceptions.

Thats not to say everything you might call "manga" is what I would call manga. If the people is just influencef by manga thats one thing, and its not really manga less they are japanese. Though I do reserve the "manga" title as well for comics that are very shallow and uncreative and just look like "I saw this character style in my favorite anime"

So if your like "hey I'm influenced by anime/manga and my work is not hollow" then to me yer not Manga. So please don't be insulted kiddies.
Image
<KittyKatBlack> You look deranged. But I mean that in the nicest way possible. ^_^;

User avatar
Godoftarot
Regular Poster
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow...
Contact:

Post by Godoftarot »

I guess I've never made a huge distinction between manga and comics. Cause like, as much as I enjoy manga, I've never really thought of it as being above other comics. And I'd like to read more American comics, but even if they do come in compilation books, they're usually really damn expensive. I like manga cause it isn't expensive and it combines art and reading, which are two of my favorite things.
And a lot of it is very whimsical in look. I like that. I seem to be drawn to art from the Eastern world, anyway, for some reason. I love ancient Chinese art. There's a class at my college that is art from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East or something, and I can't wait to take that.
Generally, as long as I can tell what I'm looking at, I can find something I enjoy about any art. I don't think every last person in the world can draw...mainly cause not every person wants to. But I think art, no matter if you're influenced by DBZ or by Van Gogh, if you're serious about learning, something distinctly you will always come through.
Besides which, the only "manga" online that I look at as trying to be a copycat is the ones that have you read right to left. That is so annoying >.<
http://godoftarot.keenspace.com
God of Tarot: Giving new meaning to the phrase "Life sucks and then you die."

User avatar
Bustertheclown
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:17 pm
Location: ATOMIC!
Contact:

Post by Bustertheclown »

Ugh, so much to respond to in this thread...

I'll start by saying that I often find myself feeling like an out of touch old man when I come to these forums. Why, back in my day, we all wanted to draw like Jim Lee and Todd McFarlane! I remember one time driving around all night once, just to find a copy of ANY anime, and it wasn't called "anime" back then, it was Japanimation. Now, where's my teeth?

The thing is that kids are influenced by the popular culture they grow up in, and the Japanese comics and animation thing is something that is definitely a unique mark of the kids who grew up post-Generation X. I figure that the vast majority of people who maintain an identifiably "Japanese" influence to their style were pre-teens during the mid-nineties.

There are a few things that I can definitely use as identifiers of why those formative years have had such an influence on the style, and how it all came to a head around 1997 or 1998. First off, the internet was just gaining its legs from the mid-90's on. I remember that during 1995 and 1996, there were some pretty awesome sites devoted to screen caps of anime that was pretty hard to find in the U.S. However, the internet was still pretty slow, and pretty text-oriented. There wasn't any Flash, and everyone was still slogging along on a 28.8 kbps modem at fastest. That meant few clips or sounds. Maybe a few GIF animations, because they were really big back in the day. Not to mention, if you weren't looking for Japanese comics and animation on the internet, you probably wouldn't easily come across it.

Secondly, there was the Sony Playstation, providing 32-bit graphics, which seemed to be enough to more accurately describe Japanese stylizations within video games. Yes, there were a few great Japanese giant robot cartoons in the 80's (yay Voltron!), but the innitial influence of the Japanese style wasn't really maintained until the advent of video gaming, because any Japanese cartoons at the time were drowned amongst the throng of American counterparts of the time. Thus, Japanese stuff has been growing within the popular culture for twenty years, since the NES hit the scene. Of course, 8-bit graphics didn't do much for showing style, and neither did 16-bit graphics for that matter. So, what we see is a bigger explosion of the style around 1997 or 1998, when the Playstation and N64 really began to start gaining their positions in the gaming market.

Thirdly, you had this thing called Pokemon. I don't think that proper credit is given to that show when fingers are pointed and fault is assigned for the otaku phenomenon. If Pokemon hadn't exploded in popularity with its games, cartoons, cards, and subsidiary merchandising, I daresay that most people would meet Japanese animation with the response of "animawhat?!" It was Pokemon that pulled WotC out of the fire and made them viable for purchase by Hasbro. It was Pokemon that helped the popularity of the Gameboy Color. It was popularity of Pokemon specifically that led to the expanded importation of shows like Sailor Moon and Dragonball Z. Yes, as stated before, there were Japanese shows in the U.S. before Pokemon, and there were even shows based upon video games before Pokemon, but most of them lacked any kind of entertainment value ("do the Mario!"), and none of them had the critical mass that Pokemon exhibited within the children's market.

How do I know this? I've been paying attention for a long time. I was going to art school in Seattle during the late nineties. Seattle, home of Nintendo US, home of WotC, and certainly a gateway to the first wave of the Anime Invasion. I was was gleefully watching it all happen in real time. Sure, I was more interested in Record of Lodoss War, Battle Angel, Nausicaa, and of course Akira at the time (and still am), but that doesn't negate the fact that before Pokemon came around, if I wanted anime I'd have to go to a specialty video store, and manga wasn't really on the popular radar yet.

Before 1997, anime and manga fandom was clearly a small subculture. There were small geeky college clubs that devoted time and resources to it, but it was not something that you could find at the local Barnes and Noble or SunCoast. I remember once in 1998, I went to a Japanese animation festival in a warehouse near the freeway. Nine straight hours watching anime that was rarely dubbed, and often found only in Japanese without subtitles. The surprising thing is that this stuff is pretty recognizeable today; Tenchi Muyo, Golden Boy, Blue Seed, amongst others. But few knew these titles back then.

So, I guess what I'm getting at here is that when you look at the trend from a historical perspective, it makes sense. It also makes sense that when you check the median age of the people who's primary influence is of the Japanese variety, and it comes in at 20 and below. It also explains why there's such a seemingly huge quantity of manga-ka wannabes. It's actually kind of a trick of technology when you think about it. Like I'd said early on, when I was a teenager, everyone wanted to draw like McFarlane and Lee and work for Marvel or Image. If the internet was such a permeating entity ten years ago, I could pretty much guarantee that people would have been decrying the sheer amount of McFarclones and acolytes of Father Lee that were out there. The way I see it, whether it be big eyes or big muscles, these things move in cycles amongst the young and impressionable. Lord knows what's gonna come next.

Also...
BloodKnight wrote: ...What really pisses me off is the majority of fan boys think the japanese are freaking artistic with all these 'techniques'. No kids, the japanese aren't artistic, they are just lazy. Kind of like White Wolf with their hundreds of rpg books.


They're not LAZY, Blood Knight. They're CHEAP.
"Just because we're amateurs, doesn't mean our comics have to be amateurish." -McDuffies

http://hastilyscribbled.comicgenesis.com

Post Reply