Fap Crusade for Ghastly!

Warmachine · Post by **Warmachine** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:48 pm

The Bard was an artist, not a scientist. I would trust his insight into humanity but not his descriptions of the nature of the physical Universe. I hate to point this out but prayer and tantric sex are merely psychosomatic effects on the people who believe in them. It's the placebo effect. I doubt Ghastly believes in prayer or tantric sex - it wouldn't work.

Rather, it is best to boost his self-esteem, which is known to improve immune systems and general health. We must appeal to what he considers worthwhile to him. Clearly, one aspect is his drawings.

We must state that we masturbate to one or more of his pictures. His art brings hope and beauty to a meaningless existence and inspires us. In particular, it inflates our sexual desires - they're that good. Indeed, there is something for everyone: hot babes, hot men, tentacle monsters, dominatrixes, transvestites, sissy nerds, religious figures in provocative clothing etc. The art of Ghastly lifts the whole world through its sexual potency.

Serpentrose · Post by **Serpentrose** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:52 pm

warmachine wrote:We must state that we masturbate to one or more of his pictures. His art brings hope and beauty to a meaningless existence and inspires us. In particular, it inflates our sexual desires - they're that good. Indeed, there is something for everyone: hot babes, hot men, tentacle monsters, dominatrixes, transvestites, sissy nerds, religious figures in provocative clothing etc. The art of Ghastly lifts the whole world through its sexual potency.

So mentioning that I had to masturbate after I discovered ghastly and read through a bunch of the archives would be helpful?

Warmachine · Post by **Warmachine** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:13 pm

serpentrose wrote:So mentioning that I had to masturbate after I discovered ghastly and read through a bunch of the archives would be helpful?

Yes! Another example of the greatness of Ghastly's drawings.

Tha_Pig · Post by **Tha_Pig** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:22 pm

mangaddict wrote:No offense but thinking of Unka G right when I'm about to cum is disturbing to say the least. Especially since I've only seen that picture where he looks like Smoky. I can just see him looking in and saying something witty and funny but which would nevertheless kill the mood faster than you can say oranges. :sudden mental picture of using Unka Ghastly blow up doll: Ahhhhhh.... :bangs head against wall: Out! Out! Ooouuuuutttt!

Ok. Now for the tentacle porn and Tony. (Tony is my battery powered toy) This one's for Unka G... :twitch: I just said it was disturbing not that I wouldn't do it.

No! I didn't mean people should masturbate thinking of Ghastly. I mean, you masturbate thinking of whatever you usually do, but then use the resulting energy to send Ghastly good bives.

In any case, you can skip the masturbation part and just wish Ghastly a fast recovery.

Jrm · Post by **Jrm** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:38 pm

i promise to do my part.

Kite-san · Post by **Kite-san** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:14 pm

warmachine wrote:The Bard was an artist, not a scientist. I would trust his insight into humanity but not his descriptions of the nature of the physical Universe. I hate to point this out but prayer and tantric sex are merely psychosomatic effects on the people who believe in them. It's the placebo effect. I doubt Ghastly believes in prayer or tantric sex - it wouldn't work.

Rather, it is best to boost his self-esteem, which is known to improve immune systems and general health. We must appeal to what he considers worthwhile to him. Clearly, one aspect is his drawings.

We must state that we masturbate to one or more of his pictures. His art brings hope and beauty to a meaningless existence and inspires us. In particular, it inflates our sexual desires - they're that good. Indeed, there is something for everyone: hot babes, hot men, tentacle monsters, dominatrixes, transvestites, sissy nerds, religious figures in provocative clothing etc. The art of Ghastly lifts the whole world through its sexual potency.

The Bard wasn't the only one to say it, several separate studies in separate hospitals noted sufficient differences in recovery time in people who didn't know they wer ebeing prayed for, by all manner of religious groups who didn't know the person they were praying for, jsut were given a name and a description of the malady, to indicate a strong correlation. certainly insufficient evidence for -causality-, but there's something more to it than the placebo effect.

Halo299 · Post by **Halo299** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:57 pm

warmachine wrote:
We must state that we masturbate to one or more of his pictures.

oh you mean his pictures as in 'pictures he has drawn" not "photos of him" LOL

silly me, and here all this time i've been jacking it while looking at that picture where he's....well never mind what i've been fapping to, but rest assured i have been fapping.

-halo

Warmachine · Post by **Warmachine** » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:41 pm

kite-san wrote:The Bard wasn't the only one to say it, several separate studies in separate hospitals noted sufficient differences in recovery time in people who didn't know they wer ebeing prayed for, by all manner of religious groups who didn't know the person they were praying for, just were given a name and a description of the malady, to indicate a strong correlation. certainly insufficient evidence for -causality-, but there's something more to it than the placebo effect.

References, please. Preferably to double blind tests. A possible, mundane cause is the more popular a patient, the more visitors and nurses talk to them as well as the more people pray for them. After all, incidents of skin cancer correlate with ice cream consumption.

Indigo Violent · Post by **Indigo Violent** » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:42 pm

kite-san wrote:The Bard wasn't the only one to say it, several separate studies in separate hospitals noted sufficient differences in recovery time in people who didn't know they wer ebeing prayed for,

I don't know about that, but people who know they're being prayed for generally do worse.
Link

Kite-san · Post by **Kite-san** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:55 pm

i've no longer got them, i'm afraid.

i read about them during an old job of mine about 4 years ago which was sorting through, cataloguing and filing the contents of several dozen tubs full of clipped out newspaper articles, and of course since this was a tedious enough task to not warant the boss's normal psychotic level of micromanagement, reading the interesting ones. i remember there were about 10 articles about these assorted studies, but not much more than that, it's been awhile.